Detailed evaluation

Please answer the following questions.

Note: For each question, please indicate a 1 to 6 score
(1=Unacceptable ; 2=Poor; 3= Sufficient; 4= Good; 5= Very good; 6= Excellent)

Are the scientific motivations and objectives of the research clearly stated? *

Are the methodological approaches appropriately and adequately described for the planned objectives? *

How would you rate the original contribution of the PhD candidate in the advancement of the research field? *

Is this thesis written in correct scientific language and style? *

Are the main results (e.g. theories, models, simulations, data analysis, devices) discussed in sufficient depth *

Are results presented in adequate detail (e.g. figure quality, graphics, figure legends) and with an appropriate logical flow? *

How would you rate this thesis in overall? *

In your opinion, could this thesis manuscript be considered for the "CUM LAUDE” distinction? *

Are the findings and the broader perspectives appropriately discussed in the context of the current literature *

Summary of the main and original results, and of positive and/or negative aspects of the thesis *

Annulla

Altro